Former Cuyahoga County Commissioner Tim Hagan has
stepped down as chair of an effort to repeal Ohio's gay marriage ban as
established gay rights groups express reservations over the proposed ballot
issue.
Last week, the Ballot Board cleared a proposed
amendment which would legalize gay marriage in the state. It would repeal a
constitutional amendment defining marriage as a heterosexual union, which passed
in 2004 with overwhelming support.
Nascent group Freedom to Marry Ohio now must
collect roughly 385,000 valid signatures from at least half of Ohio's 88
counties to get their proposal on next year's ballot.
Three established gay rights groups appear to be
steering clear of the effort, each saying the timing isn't right.
Freedom to Marry, the nation's largest group
devoted to the issue of marriage equality, told the
Gay People's Chronicle that it is not behind the
effort.
“Ballot measures are expensive and we need to do
years of groundwork, hit benchmarks, and get the state to where we can win,”
said Marc Solomon, national campaign director for Freedom to Marry. “Getting to
the ballot is the last step. It should never be the first step.”
Ohio Public Radio reported that the Human Rights
Campaign (HRC), the nation's largest gay rights advocate, has said it also was
withholding its endorsement.
Ed Mullen, executive director for Equality Ohio,
the state's largest gay rights advocate, told
The Columbus Dispatch that sufficient “research and
analysis has not been done that would make this a successful effort.”
The lack of support prompted Hagan, Freedom to
Marry Ohio's high-profile chair, to quit.
“Because there's not a unified voice, certainly
among the gay community, we need to take a step back and make sure everybody is
singing from the same hymnal,” Hagan told
Ohio Public Radio.
Freedom to Marry Ohio is helmed by Ian James, who
also headed the group which unsuccessfully campaigned in 2004 to defeat the
ban.
James brushed aside the problems, telling the
Dispatch that the ballot issue was moving forward.
“It's going to be a challenge to overturn the
marriage ban. But it has to begin sometime, and the time is now,” said James.
“We have tens of thousands of people out there who want the freedom to marry. We
are not going to let them down. … We're not stopping.”
No comments:
Post a Comment