Sunday, April 29, 2012

Columbus Dispatch: The Pizzutis honor their past, remake the future of the Short North


The Pizzutis honor their past, remake the future of the Short North


By  Steve Wartenberg
The Columbus Dispatch Sunday April 29, 2012 6:50 AM

The idea took hold as Joel Pizzuti traveled the country on business, often staying in boutique hotels, which are smaller and more expensive than the typical full-service hotel and are chock-full of atmosphere, art and amenities.

“All the top markets have them,” said the president of Pizzuti Cos., the Columbus-based real-estate development firm that built the Miranova complex and oversaw construction of the new Franklin County courthouse.

“Miami is littered with them, Nashville and Louisville have one, Des Moines has two,” Pizzuti said.

“Columbus needed a full-service boutique hotel that will be as dynamic as the ones you find in New York, San Francisco and Chicago.”

It’s on the way, he said, as part of a $59 million Pizzuti project in the Short North that includes an 11-story, 135-room boutique hotel — the Joseph — on the east side of N. High Street, just south of E. Russell Street. 

Across N. High, the project includes a six-story, 55,000-square-foot office building, a 313-car parking garage and the Pizzuti Collection gallery, which will house the vast modern art collection of company founder Ron Pizzuti.

   While there was some opposition to the modern design of the project, city and business groups are backing the project and it is quickly moving forward, with a likely opening sometime in 2014.

   “We are very excited about this project,” said Diesha Condon, senior director of the Short North Business Association. “Ron has a world-class art collection, and this will bring in new visitors, and the parking garage, well, any time you add parking spaces here, that’s amazing.”

   Marcella’s — a Cameron Mitchell restaurant — is just south of the project’s office building.

   “I couldn’t be more excited,” Mitchell said. “The Joseph will bring in leisure travelers and will add even more vibrancy to the   Short North, which is already growing by leaps and bounds.”

   The nuts and bolts of the project have taken time to come together, but on March 19, the Columbus City Council authorized the Department of Development to enter into an economic-development agreement with Pizzuti. The proposed deal includes a 10-year, 75 percent tax abatement for the office building, and inclusion of the parking garage in the area’s tax-increment financing district, a city program that returns a portion of a developer’s taxes to pay for the project.

   The city also has an agreement to sell an existing surface parking lot to Pizzuti for $1; that will be the site for the Joseph. In return, Pizzuti will pay the city $125,000 a year for five years to offset the loss of 40 parking meters. 

 The city also could spend up to $1.9 million to renovate Millay Alley, creating a pedestrian-friendly gateway between the Joseph and Goodale Park.

   All of these provisions must be voted upon by the City Council and “should be moving forward in the coming months,” said Bill Webster of the city’s development department. Once this occurs, Joel Pizzuti said, the project will take 18 to 22 months to complete.

   The art gallery will be housed in a section of the current United     Commercial Travelers building, a limestone-faced building that fronts Goodale Park. Part of the building will be demolished to make space for the parking garage.

   After several back-and-forth sessions with Pizzuti, the Victorian Village Commission recently approved the developer’s revised plan by a 3-2 vote.

   “There were a lot of issues related to the architecture and look of the new buildings and the demolition of part of the UCT building,” said commission member Marc Conte, who voted no.

   Changes were made that brought the look of the building more in line with the surrounding architecture.

   “I still don’t feel they’ve met the standards,” Conte said.

   The design of the project shows a structure that is taller and has a somewhat more-modern look, with more glass and less brick, than traditional Short North buildings. But Conte thinks it’s an economic win.

   “That’s never been an issue for me, and all of that is positive,” he said.
 
   The Italian Village Commission approved the project by a 4-0 vote.

   “There were a lot of components to discuss, the partial demolition, the size of the additions,” said Randy Black, the city’s historic preservation officer. “But after a complete review, it was determined things fit in pretty nicely.”

   Developing the Joseph has become a passion for the Pizzutis.

   “That was my grandfather’s name, and it means a lot to my father,” Joel Pizzuti said.
 
   His grandfather’s name actually was Giuseppi, but everyone called him Joseph.

   “He came to this country from Calabria (in southern Italy) and lived in Kent, Ohio — and my father was the first Pizzuti born in this country,” he said. “My grandfather was a laborer when he got here.”

   The Joseph will offer spa services and have a restaurant on the ground floor, banquet and meeting space and will be filled with art.

   Pizzuti would not say who will operate the restaurant, but restaurateur Mitchell   said, “We’ve had some preliminary discussions, but nothing definitive.”

   The average room price will be about $185 a night, Pizzuti said, which is more than hotels in the convention center area. The Joseph’s market is high-end business travelers, tourists and a small percentage of the people attending conventions.

   “I think Columbus is ready for an upscale boutique hotel,” said Eric Belfrage, a hotel specialist with CB Richard Ellis in Columbus. “It won’t appeal to the masses, but they’re eclectic and   small enough that they won’t have to sell blocks of hundreds of rooms like the (almost-completed and 522-room Hilton Columbus Downtown) will have to sell.”

   The 44-room Lofts hotel on Nationwide Boulevard is considered a boutique hotel, but it does not have a restaurant and some of the other amenities that the Joseph will.

   Despite a sluggish market for office space, there seems to be a market for the proposed office building, which will feature retail on the ground floor.

   “There’s always a market for the best-located space, and the Short North is the best,” said Mike Simpson of NAI Ohio Equities. “The organic development of the area and relation to Downtown make it desirable.”

   Kent Rigsby, owner of the popular Rigsby’s Kitchen in the Short North, said he also has spoken to Pizzuti about the Joseph’s restaurant.

   “I think the hotel will be a real positive for the neighborhood,” Rigsby said. “And the art gallery-museum will be world class and impact this neighborhood in a big way, with people coming from all over to see it.”

Police profiling? A look at the life and work of Columbus' new chief of police, Kimberley Jacobs


Chief a listener open to change


By  Theodore Decker
The Columbus Dispatch Sunday April 29, 2012 6:15 AM

Kimberley Jacobs was a patrol officer in the early 1980s when she sent a memo up the chain of command, recommending that the Columbus Division of Police change its handling of death investigations.

Police often respond to death scenes to ensure that no crime has occurred. But back then, Jacobs thought one scenario didn’t seem reasonable or essential: Police were required to go to homes after a resident had died while in hospice care.

“There was no need for us to be there,” she said. “We didn’t need to invade the privacy of the moment.”

The rule was changed, and Jacobs learned a lesson that she said helped her to become the division’s 32nd chief and first female chief.

“A lot of people just don’t go to the effort,” Jacobs said last week. “They think that’s the way it is, and they don’t try to change things.”

Jacobs, 54, was selected from among four deputy chiefs. Mayor Michael B. Coleman said she was chosen for her innovation, leadership and efficiency. According to the Department of Public Safety, she will be paid $148,175 annually.

Jacobs is one of five children of Dottie and Calvin Knight, a nurse and an Ohio State University Extension agent.

She was born in Paulding, though her family later moved near Steubenville and again to Ashland, where Jacobs was a multisport high-school athlete.

After graduation, she majored in sociology and ran hurdles at Ohio State University. Police work was not yet on her mind. She had hoped to become a veterinarian.

“I knew every horse breed, I knew every dog breed when I was growing up,” she said.

Jacobs said she considered law enforcement only after the State Highway Patrol showed an interest in her.

She joined the Columbus force in 1979 and soon was on the streets of Franklinton, teamed with an officer with whom she eventually married.

Back then, women rarely appeared in the ranks.

“I heard about other women, but I didn’t see them,” she said. “There were so few of us that there weren’t even enough of us for a clique.

“There was a lot of apprehension. You had to prove yourself.”

Though she enjoyed the streets, Jacobs gradually discovered that she was suited for police work behind the scenes.

“I had an aptitude for administrative stuff,” she said. “I was even more organized than I am now. I had every single phone number within the Division of Police memorized, I think.”

She revamped the division’s ride-along program. She wrote a handbook, “B Company Basics,” for new sergeants.

Retired Deputy Chief Antone Lanata remembers when Jacobs floated an idea to retool how police handled calls for service. Lanata gave her a year to study and fix the problem, which she did.

He said he came to rely upon Jacobs as a go-to subordinate who could be trusted to speak the truth.

“I just found her encyclopedic in her knowledge and her ideas,” Lanata said. “She was dead-on with everything. Kim knew what was really going on.”

In 1995, she became the first female commander, overseeing at different times the communications and internal-affairs bureaus and Zone 4.

As a deputy chief under Chief Walter Distelzweig, Jacobs caught some flak for her role in a 2010 patrol reorganization that drew fire from the police union.

“That was a very difficult assignment that Chief Distelzweig gave her,” said Ohio State University sociology professor Richard Lundman. “She didn’t make a lot of friends doing that.”

Lundman taught Jacobs as an undergraduate and invites her back to Ohio State each year to speak to his classes.

“She has very clearly paid her dues,” he said.

Jacobs and her husband divorced after 20 years of marriage. Their sons, Sam and Peter, are both grown.

She said Peter hopes to follow his parents into police work.

Jacobs lives on the Northwest Side with her partner of seven years, Bobbi Bedinghaus, who is a sign-language instructor. They share their home with Bedinghaus’ 17-year-old daughter and the couple’s two wheaten terriers.

Jacobs has spent her first weeks as chief meeting with her command staff and visiting substations. Gun violence and property crimes have her attention, and a reorganization of the detective bureau is on the horizon.

“I’ve already heard strategies in some of my roll calls, and said, “Yup, you’re right, that strategy sounds a lot better,” she said of her meetings with patrol officers. “They have great ideas. They just need to be listened to.”

Sgt. Jim Gilbert, president of the Fraternal Order of Police Capital City Lodge No. 9, has been impressed with Jacobs’ early accessibility.

“So far, she’s been asking for a lot of opinions, which is good,” he said. “You can agree to disagree, but communication is very important.”

Jacobs said, “I can handle people disagreeing with me. I just like to make sure that it’s based on facts.”

She said she wants people to feel good about the work they do.

“I think that I can give that to them. One of the ways is to answer those concerns that they have, those rumors that they’ve heard that aren’t true, and let them know that yes, indeed, we do have an exciting future.”

Saturday, April 28, 2012

Ohio Democratic Party State Executive Committee Announces 2012 Democratic National Convention Delegates




FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 28, 2012
Contact: Press Office

Ohio Democratic Party State Executive Committee Announces 2012 Democratic National Convention Delegates

COLUMBUS, OHIO – Today, the Ohio Democratic Party's State Executive Committee, the governing body of the Party, met to approve and announce delegate appopintments for the 2012 Democratic National Convention and new members of the Democratic National Committee.

Appointed to be PLEO (Public Leaders and Elected Officials)delegates were:


Joyce Beatty
Frances Strickland
Sandra Williams
Charleta Tavares
Debbie Phillips
Nan Whaley
Kathleen Clyde
Shirley Smith
Yvette Simpson
Barbara Boyd
Marilyn Brown
Sarah Drew
Ted Strickland
Michael Coleman
Armond Budish
Eric Kearney
Ed FitzGerald
Wade Kapszekiewicz
Chase Rittenhauer
Chris Seelbach
Vern Sykes
Wayne Jones
Clayton Luckie

Appointed as at-large delegates to the National Convention were:

Chris Bashein
Jack Landskroner
John Lyall
Timothy Burga
Christopher Mabe
Gary Martin
Dan Dodd
Tom Grote
Terry Penrod
John Frola
Dennis Wilcox
Nick “Sonny” Nardi
Paul DeMarco
Albert Lin
Dave Betras
Michael Wager
Dr. Daniel Nguyen
Baldermar Velasquez
Robert Torres
Jennie Berliant
Ruby Gilliam
Karen Aronoff-Holtmeier
Katherine Bowman
Patricia Frost-Brooks
Linda Mansour
Valarie McCall
Lakshmi Satyanarayana
Janet Carlisle
Becky Williams
Penny Tipps
Karen Morrison
Suzanne Scrutton
Francine Lawrence
Melissa Hedden
Isabel Framer
Lourdes Barroso de Padilla
Brigid Kelly
Lana Moresky

Appointed to serve as at-large alternates to the National Convention were John Boccieri, Jake Young, Lauren Kinsey, and Liz Shirey.

Also at the meeting, Patricia Frost-Brooks, Valarie McCall, Jocelyn Bucaro, Kathleen Clyde, Joe Rugola, Ron Malone, and Mark Mallory were appointed as new members of the 2012-2016 Democratic National Committee.

The 2012 Democratic National Convention will be held during the week of September 3, 2012 in Charlotte, North Carolina.

###

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Columbus Underground: Whit’s Frozen Custard Opening in The Short North


Whit’s Frozen Custard Opening in The Short North

By: Walker

Warm summer-ish weather is already upon us, and The Short North will gain another place to cool down this June when Whit’s Frozen Custard opens at 841 North High Street in the Dakota Building. Launched in Granville, this Central Ohio business has quickly expanded with over a dozen locations stretching from Delaware to Athens and beyond. Much more at Columbus Underground

Beautiful British Marriage Equality Commercial




Please share this with friends and people you love.
Sign petition: http://www.C4EM.org.uk
Directed by Mike Buonaiuto http://www.MikeB.co.nr
Music: 'Fingers Crossed' by http://www.megalithmusic.co.uk

Cast: Lew Smart | James William Knight | TJ Resendes

Producer: Amber Phillips

Executive Producers:
Conor Marron | James Lattimore 
http://www.C4EM.org.uk
Stephen Pomeroy
http://www.RemarkableGroup.co.uk

Behind The Scenes: Leighton Cox
http://www.LeightonCox.co.uk 

After Effects: Scott Gordon, Los Angeles, USA
http://moshn.wordpress.com/

Photography: Ellie Rose Kynaston

Online Marketing: Lee Washington
http://www.viralseeding.com

HRC: New Pew Poll Shows Increasing Support for Marriage Equality







FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 26, 2012




New Pew Poll Shows Increasing Support for Marriage Equality

Numbers also show opposition to marriage equality reaches an all-time low

Washington – New polling data from the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press shows support for marriage equality at 47 percent – significantly higher than it was at any point prior to previous presidential elections. The poll also finds opposition to marriage equality has reached an all-time low. According to the polling, opposition to marriage equality has plummeted nearly 15 percentage points over the last decade, while support has climbed by more than 10 percentage points. The Pew data is just the latest in a number of polls illustrating how issues of LGBT equality are increasingly mainstream, and can no longer be used as divisive wedges.


The landscape surrounding support for LGBT issues has changed significantly since the 2008 presidential election. In previous elections, particularly in 2004, marriage equality was used as a wedge issue to divide voters. This growing wave of data shows that such a strategy will no longer work. A 2011 Gallup poll found that support for marriage equality stood at an all-time high of 53 percent. A Washington Post/ABC News poll also clocked support at 53 percent – up 17 percentage points from just five years prior. A 2010 Associated Press poll found support at 52 percent. And, a Greenberg Quinlan Rosner poll recently found that an astounding 85 percent of people of faith say their religious beliefs lead them to the conclusion that LGBT people should be treated equally under the law.


“An increasing number of Americans support equality for LGBT people on a wide array of issues, from marriage equality to non-discrimination,” said HRC President Joe Solmonese. “These data reinforce the message we’re hearing over and over again as we approach the 2012 elections: being anti-LGBT is not a winning position for any candidate. As more and more Americans hear the personal stories of their LGBT family members and friends, they’re coming to the conclusion that we deserve the same rights, benefits, and protections that everyone else receives.”


This latest round of data comes one week after Pew released statistics highlighting marriage equality as the least important issue on the minds of voters in advance of the 2012 election, signaling how matters of LGBT equality are no longer as divisive as they once were. That Pew poll identified the economy, jobs, and the budget deficit as weighing most heavily on voters’ minds.


The Human Rights Campaign is America’s largest civil rights organization working to achieve lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equality. By inspiring and engaging all Americans, HRC strives to end discrimination against LGBT citizens and realize a nation that achieves fundamental fairness and equality for all.
# # #

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Registration Open for Leadership Summit for LGBTQ Young Adults of Color




For Immediate Release
April 23, 2012
Contact: Erin Upchurch, MSSA, LSW
  
Registration Open for Leadership Summit for LGBTQ Young Adults of Color

Online registration is now open for the HUE Leadership Development Program. HUE is a revolutionary project for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) young adults of color, ages 18-25.  The mission of HUE is to build the leadership, political consciousness, and organizing skills of LGBTQ youth of color across the state of Ohio. The project will be directed and coordinated by Diversity & Organizational Strategist Erin Upchurch, MSSA, LSW who is a long time community activist and advocate for social justice, with multiple years of experience in community planning and outreach.

Participants in the HUE Leadership Development Program will attend a day long leadership summit where they will receive hands on training and instruction designed to develop future activists and community leaders. They will engage in one on one and group mentorship from local LGBTQ/allied leaders of color, and will work together to design and complete a local community service project. The summit is scheduled for Saturday July 28, 2012 and will be held at the Columbus Urban League from 8a-4:30p. There is no cost to attend.


(Participants may also register at www.diversestrategies.org; click on **HUE Leadership Summit and follow the link "Register Today".)

HUE is sponsored by Equality Ohio Education Fund, Columbus Urban League, and OSU Multicultural Center. Community partners include Stonewall Columbus, TransOhio, New Leaf Columbus, Equality Federation, Fellowship Family House, Advent United Church of Christ, and Whosever Ministry, Advent UCC.

For sponsorship and/or mentoring opportunities, please contact Erin Upchurch at leadershipdevelopment@diversestrategies.org



Diverse Strategies is an innovative consulting firm focused on changing tomorrow. We offer unique strategies for diversity and inclusion aimed to increase knowledge, empathy, and understanding. We believe the foundation of a strong community develops through comprehensive learning and education. Please visit our website at www.diversestrategies.org

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

HRC Applauds Federal Agency Ruling Protecting Transgender Workers




FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 24, 2012
Michael Cole-Schwartz



HRC Applauds Federal Agency Ruling Protecting Transgender Workers

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Concludes That Title VII Prohibits Gender Identity Discrimination


WASHINGTON – The Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) civil rights organization, today applauded a ruling late yesterday by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency charged with enforcing federal laws barring workplace discrimination, in which it concluded that the prohibition on sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 includes discrimination based on gender identity.  While a growing number of federal courts have reached the same conclusion in recent years, this is the first time the EEOC has issued an opinion on this issue; today’s decision makes clear that transgender people across the country who have experienced workplace discrimination are able to file a claim under federal sex discrimination law with the EEOC.  The ruling comes in the case of Mia Macy, a transgender woman denied a job by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF), who is represented by Transgender Law Center.
      
“This ruling is a major step forward in protecting the LGBT community from workplace discrimination,” said HRC President Joe Solmonese.  “We know that transgender people are among the most vulnerable members of our community and suffer widespread discrimination, including in employment.  We applaud the EEOC for its historic ruling, congratulate Transgender Law Center on this victory and thank Mia Macy for her courage and perseverance.”


Currently, there is no federal law explicitly barring employment discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.  While many states have moved to protect LGBT under their own anti-discrimination laws, there are no such protections based on sexual orientation in 29 states, or based on gender identity in 34 states.  While today’s ruling provides stronger protections for transgender workers, federal courts have broadly concluded that discrimination based on sexual orientation is not prohibited by Title VII. 


“While the EEOC has strengthened protections for transgender workers, it is critical that the entire LGBT community have clear, strong protections against workplace discrimination in federal law,” added Solmonese.  “Policymakers must take every step available to them to ensure all workers have a level playing field, including passage of an inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) and the adoption of an executive order barring discrimination by federal contractors.” 


The Human Rights Campaign is America's largest civil rights organization working to achieve lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equality. By inspiring and engaging all Americans, HRC strives to end discrimination against LGBT citizens and realize a nation that achieves fundamental fairness and equality for all.
# # #

Kroger Rewards for Equality



Looking for an easy way to help Equality Ohio?

The Kroger Rewards Program allows Kroger shoppers to donate money to Equality Ohio just by swiping their Kroger card each time they shop.

It’s easy for members to enroll or re-enroll in Kroger Community Rewards.
Visit www.krogercommunityrewards.com , click on “Columbus, Ohio” and “enroll" or "re-enroll”, follow the instructions for signing in and then the three steps below:

1. To find your desired organization (Equality Ohio), enter your organization number or at least 5 characters of your desired organization's name and click "search".

2. Select Your Organization Select your organization below.

3. Save Your Selection.

It’s as easy as that! Please enroll or re-enroll today and thanks for your continued support!

Scarlet & Gay Scholarships Recipients Announced




April 23, 2012
                                   
SCARLET & GAY SCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS ANNOUNCED

Eight Students to Receive Scholarships Sponsored by the OSU GLBT Alumni Society

COLUMBUS – Scarlet & Gay, The Ohio State University’s Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender (GLBT) Alumni Society announced today the eight winners of 2012 OSU GLBT Scholarship Program.

The program provides scholarships to GLBT and ally students attending The Ohio State University who have devoted time and energy toward enhancing the GLBT community. 

Seven scholarships, each for $1,500, were awarded to current OSU undergraduate students.  An additional brand new scholarship in honor of alumnus Thomas Fogel was awarded to a student with a combination of need and service to the community for $2,500.  The Eric Kohring- PFLAG Scholarship is dedicated to students who have contributed to the GLBT community through leadership, service, volunteering or research.  There are five Harold A. McIntosh Scholarships that recognize leadership, service and a new OSU student. The Mark Moffett, Jr. Memorial Scholarship is awarded to a GLBT student majoring in music. 

The 2012 scholarship recipients include:

Heath Barron, junior in Music Education, Mark Moffett Jr. Memorial Scholarship

Dominique Bortmas; junior in Women’s, Gender, & Sexuality Studies and English, Thomas Fogel PFLAG Memorial Scholarship

Daniel Ehrman; junior in Human Ecology and Early Childhood Development, Eric Kohring PFLAG Scholarship

Kelsey Gallagher; junior in Anthropology, Harold A. McIntosh Scholarship

Nevin Heard; senior in Psychology and Sociology, Harold A McIntosh Scholarship

Florin Helf; sophomore in Arts Management, Harold A. McIntosh Scholarship

Jordan Kelsey; senior in Spanish and Comparative Studies, Harold A. McIntosh Scholarship

Austin Soejoto; senior in International Studies and Spanish, Harold A. McIntosh Scholarship

"This year’s OSU GLBT Alumni Society scholarship winners are among the most compelling and involved students we’ve ever recognized," said Tim Valentine, OSU GLBT Alumni Society president. "These students are determined to reach their goals at The Ohio State University and we are delighted to help them on their journey."

The 2012 recipients will be recognized at a special Rainbow Celebration on May 30 at the Longaberger Alumni House on The Ohio State University campus.

The GLBT Alumni Society has been dedicated to making studying at The Ohio State University a financial reality for GLBT and students and their allies. Realizing that the financial demands placed on students and families because of the rising cost of higher education is often multiplied for GLBT students.  Fundraising efforts by the Society has made these scholarships a reality. There is a hope that we can reach students who have been turned away by their family for “coming out” and help GLBT students address other financial issues that are unique to them.

Since 1997, the University has partnered with the Columbus Chapter of Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG) in order to offer the Eric Kohring – PFLAG Scholarship. Various gifts from the community, including a seed gift from the estate of Eric Kohring, allowed the GLBT Alumni Society to both offer the scholarships through the years and to create the first endowed scholarship for GLBT students in the state of Ohio.

In 2002, a gift from the estate of Harold “Marc” McIntosh created another five endowed scholarships for GLBT students. This gift was among the first to dedicate scholarships targeted towards people living with HIV and AIDS and towards GLBT students who are new to the University.

In 2005, an additional scholarship, entitled the Mark Moffett, Jr. Memorial Scholarship, was added to recognize an outstanding music major in the GLBT community.  In 2011, through a family donation, a new scholarship named after alumnus Thomas Fogel. 

Members of the scholarship review and selection committee included:
Peg Allemang, PFLAG Columbus; Siobhan Boyd, OSU GLBT Alumni Society board member; Duan Cannon, PFLAG Columbus; Jenn Clarke, PFLAG Columbus; Tamara Davis, OSU professor in College of Social Work; Karl Kisner, OSU alumnus; Debra Moddelmog, OSU professor in English, Sexuality Studies, & English; Charlie Runyan, scholarship committee chair; Diane Stemper, OSU Director of Student Financial Aid; Harrison Hove, meteorologist and reporter for the Ohio News Network; and Angie Wellman, Intercultural Specialist, LGBTQ student initiatives with the OSU Multicultural Center.

The Ohio State University Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender (GLBT) Alumni Society's mission is to promote the best interests of the gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender alumni and students of The Ohio State University. The Society sponsors a scholarship program, social events for students and alumni and collaborates with community organizations regularly to promote awareness and education of GLBT issues.

For more information about Scarlet & Gay: The Ohio State University Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender (GLBT) Alumni Society, its scholarship program or how to donate or create a scholarship, visit www.scarletandgay.com.

Italian Village Clean-Up This Saturday, April 28, 2012


Italian Village Clean-Up

This Saturday, April 28, 2012
 

The Italian Village Clean-Up is happening this Saturday! Please join your neighbors to pick up trash and recycling on the streets and in the parks of Italian Village. We will meet at Italian Village Park at 11AM where you will get your supplies - trash bags, gloves, and safety vests - and where we will divide into groups to clean areas of our neighborhood.
You are welcome to bring children and pets (as long as they get along well with others)!

The Martha Walker Garden Club has donated annuals as a give-away to the first 10 people who show up on Saturday.

Italian Village Clean-Up
Saturday, April 28, 2012
11AM - 1PM
Italian Village Park (corner of Kerr Street and Hubbard Avenue)
Facebook event


Let's make this place shine!

Monday, April 23, 2012

Columbus Dispatch: Goodale Park pond continues to leak



Goodale Park pond continues to leak

The Goodale Park pond leaked through the weekend dropping more than two inches since Friday.

As of Sunday, the pond's water level was down 12 1/2 inches below the overflow line, according to Terri Leist, Columbus' assistant recreation and parks director. That means the water level has dropped nine inches since the city stopped filling the pond on April 13.

City officials are still trying to find the source of the leak, although some people suspect the fountain the Friends of Goodale Park installed last year.

The city spent $144,600 to put down a bentonite (clay) surface officials hoped would prevent the pond from draining as it did last year.

Metro Weekly: Transgender Breakthrough


Transgender Breakthrough

EEOC ruling that gender-identity discrimination is covered by Title VII is a ''sea change'' that opens the doors to employment protection for transgender Americans

By Chris Geidner
Published on April 23, 2012, 10:38pm


An employer who discriminates against an employee or applicant on the basis of the person's gender identity is violating the prohibition on sex discrimination contained in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, according to an opinion issued on April 20 by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The opinion, experts say, could dramatically alter the legal landscape for transgender workers across the nation.

The opinion came in a decision delivered on Monday, April 23, to lawyers for Mia Macy, a transgender woman who claims she was denied employment with the Department of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) after the agency learned of her transition. It also comes on the heels of a growing number of federal appellate and trial courts deciding that gender-identity discrimination constitutes sex discrimination, whether based on Title VII or the constitutional guarantee of equal protection of the laws.

The EEOC decision, issued without objection by the five-member, bipartisan commission, will apply to all EEOC enforcement and litigation activities at the commission and in its 53 field offices throughout the country. It also will be binding on all federal agencies and departments.

In the decision, the EEOC states, ''[T]he Commission hereby clarifies that claims of discrimination based on transgender status, also referred to as claims of discrimination based on gender identity, are cognizable under Title VII's sex discrimination prohibition ....''
Masen Davis
Masen Davis
Masen Davis, head of the Transgender Law Center (TLC), says the decision is a ''big leap forward.'' TLC advocates, who brought Macy's case, note that after today's ruling transgender people who feel they have faced employment discrimination can go into any of those 53 offices and the EEOC will consider their claims. What's more, the EEOC could take action itself to sue the employer for discrimination.

''Given the incredibly high rate of employment discrimination facing transgender people, this is incredibly significant for us. Data from the National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force found that 78 percent of transgender Americans say they've experienced workplace discrimination at some point in time,'' Davis tells Metro Weekly. ''Given that transgender people do not have employment protections in the vast majority of states, this creates a whole new fabric of legal support for our community.''

Macy says that the discrimination she faced after having gone through the background check for a job as a ballistics technician was abrupt. She had applied as a man before transitioning and she says, ''Within three days after my background [check] was completed and they alerted the lab that Mia would be coming to work, I was notified that the position was no longer available — even though I was certified and trained for the job.''

She later found out that another person had been hired for the position.

Macy says that before she even knew about the other person being hired, she ''didn't think something was right'' and contacted the Transgender Law Center, which took her case. Davis says Macy's case was an obvious one to pursue.

''We hear from 1,500 people a year who are experiencing discrimination, and our attorneys work every day to help out everyone who calls and make sure they have the legal information and support they need to be successful. Sometimes we hear from people who have suffered such egregious discrimination that we have to put every resource into righting a wrong,'' he says. ''And, in this case, we heard from Mia Macy, who was so clearly discriminated against — somebody who had been so clearly qualified for a job that she had every right ... and we had every responsibility to bring this case forward.''

TLC filed a formal complaint on behalf of Macy with the Office of Equal Opportunity (EO) of the ATF, which is responsible for handling internal complaints of discrimination within the ATF. Among the claims was one that Macy was discriminated against under Title VII because of her gender identity.

According to Macy's TLC attorney, Matt Wood, ''in October [2011], [the EO] responded to that filing by letting us know that the EEO process was not available to her because they did not view, in their mind, that Title VII applied to transgender employees.'' In a series of letters between ATF and Wood the issues underlying Macy's claim were disputed, but Wood says that, eventually, ''We appealed to the EEOC, and that was in December of last year, asking for them to clarify the law.''

THE LAW: In 1974, Ramona Holloway — initially hired as Robert — was fired after telling her employer, Arthur Andersen and Company, that she was taking hormones and intended to transition.

In a lawsuit challenging that firing, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit noted that, after the disclosure of Holloway's intended transition, ''an official of the company suggested that appellant would be happier at a new job where her transsexualism would be unknown.'' Soon thereafter, when she did not leave the company after asking that her name be changed in the company's records, she was fired.

When the Ninth Circuit looked at Title VII, including the amendments to it contained in the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972, the court concluded that ''the provisions were intended to place women on an equal footing with men.'' In light of this, the court dismissed Holloway's claim because, as the court held, ''Giving the statute its plain meaning, this court concludes that Congress had only the traditional notions of 'sex' in mind.''

Although claims of transgender discrimination were treated with ''disdain'' in those early days of Title VII interpretation, as National Center for Lesbian Rights legal director Shannon Minter puts it, two Supreme Court cases that followed dramatically changed the views of lower courts on the issue.

In the first, Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, the Supreme Court in 1989 addressed the claim brought by Ann Hopkins, who sued for sex discrimination because she was not offered a partnership at the accounting firm. Her chances would be improved in the future, she had been told, if she ''[w]ould 'walk more femininely, talk more femininely, dress more femininely, wear make-up, have her hair styled, and wear jewelry.''' Describing Title VII, the court noted the words in the statute prohibiting sex discrimination and concluded, ''We take these words to mean that gender must be irrelevant to employment decisions.''

In the second, Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., the Supreme Court considered the case of Joseph Oncale, a man who worked on an oil platform in the Gulf of Mexico and was ''forcibly subjected to sex-related, humiliating actions against him'' by members of the eight-man crew, ''physically assaulted ... in a sexual manner'' and threatened with rape. Noting that male-on-male sexual harassment was ''assuredly'' not the aim of Congress when passing Title VII, Justice Antonin Scalia noted that ''statutory prohibitions often go beyond the principal evil to cover reasonably comparable evils, and it is ultimately the provisions of our laws rather than the principal concerns of our legislators by which we are governed.''

Although neither was directly on point, the Price Waterhouse conclusion that sex discrimination includes protection of those who are gender nonconforming and the Oncale conclusion that Title VII's protections do expand, within the text of the law, to areas not considered when the law was passed opened up the pathway to a reversal of those 1970s and 1980s decisions.

Assessing the landscape, Minter contrasts the early cases to the more recent cases, saying, ''It was really so clear when you read those decisions that they were simply based on disdain for transgender people, and it has been very encouraging over the past 10 to 15 years to see the courts changing that, to see that trend reversing itself.''

Ilona Turner, the legal director at TLC, concurs, telling Metro Weekly, ''The very strong, very clear trend by all of the federal courts that have heard this kind of case in recent years has been to hold that Title VII's sex-discrimination prohibition protects transgender people.''

When the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in 2004 heard the case of Jimmie Smith, a lieutenant in the Salem Fire Department in Ohio who claimed he was suspended in retaliation for hiring counsel after officials learned of Smith's plans to transition, it applied Price Waterhouse to Smith's claim.

''[D]iscrimination against a plaintiff who is a transsexual — and therefore fails to act and/or identify with his or her gender — is no different from the discrimination directed against Ann Hopkins in Price Waterhouse, who, in sex-stereotypical terms, did not act like a woman,'' the three-judge panel held.

This past December, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit held that Vandiver Elizabeth Glenn — a transgender woman fired from her job as an editor with the Georgia General Assembly's Office of Legislative Counsel because her boss, among other things, said her transition was ''unnatural'' — was discriminated against on the basis of sex because of anti-transgender treatment.

Applying other courts' Title VII analysis to Glenn's claim brought under the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, the three-judge panel held, ''We conclude that a government agent violates the Equal Protection Clause's prohibition of sex-based discrimination when he or she fires a transgender or transsexual employee because of his or her gender non-conformity.''

Appeals courts in San Francisco, Boston and D.C. have reached similar conclusions.

THE EEOC: Less than two months before the 11th Circuit's opinion in Glenn's case, the EEOC had put down a marker on its view of the question in a little-noted filing by the commission's general counsel in a trial-court case involving Freedom Buick GMC Truck in Midland, Texas.

In the case, in which Alex Pacheco had been fired from her job as a receptionist at the dealership shortly after she had begun taking hormones and disclosing that she wished to begin presenting as a female at work, the EEOC filed a motion Oct. 17, 2011, asking the court to allow it to file an amicus curiae, or friend-of-the-court brief. The EEOC regularly files such briefs to inform courts about its views on the state of the law.
As Minter says, ''The EEOC is the administrative agency that is charged with interpreting Title VII and other nondiscrimination statutes, and the federal courts give a lot of deference to EEOC's interpretation of the statute. They're not strictly bound by it, but an EEOC ruling does get a lot of deference.''

In Pacheco's case, the EEOC had sought to file a brief stating, ''In Price Waterhouse, the Supreme Court recognized that Title VII's prohibition of discrimination 'because of … sex' means 'that gender must be irrelevant to employment decisions.''' It went on to note the ''discrimination based on a failure to conform to stereotypical gender norms'' is thus prohibited and concluding that ''if an employer were to take an adverse employment action because an employee's gender identity is not consistent with the employee's biological sex, the employer would be discriminating 'because of … sex.'''

In an appellate court, the EEOC would have the right to file an amicus brief without obtaining court permission, but, at the trial-court level, it must seek court approval to do so. In Pacheco's case, the EEOC filed a motion asking the court to let it file an amicus brief in the case — but also attached the brief that it would be submitting in the case as an exhibit to the motion. Here, the judge denied the EEOC's request as moot on Nov. 1, 2011, because the judge decided days earlier, on Oct. 28, 2011, that Freedom Buick GMC Truck's motion to have the case decided in its favor before trial was denied.

On March 23, the court in Texas closed Pacheco's case because earlier that day the court had received notice that Freedom Buick GMC Truck had reached a settlement with Pacheco.

But, the brief was submitted on the EEOC's behalf, and though little noted at the time — likely since it was never accepted by the court — the October filing was given new life on a far more broad level today with the EEOC's ruling in Macy's case.

In the decision in her case, none of the five commissioners — which include two Republican members — objected to the conclusion that gender-identity discrimination is sex discrimination actionable under Title VII. Because the case is an appeal from the ATF EO decision, the case was considered by the Office of Federal Operations within the EEOC and then presented to the full commission for its consideration.

In the decision, which is signed by the executive secretary for the commission — a procedural move that those familiar with EEOC process say means the decision is binding on all federal agencies — the commission considers first whether the case has properly come before it for review and then, because of ATF's conclusion that Title VII's prohibition on sex discrimination does not include transgender discrimination, whether it has jurisdiction over the case.

In today's opinion, the EEOC concludes that the case is properly before it and that, consistent with the overwhelming trend of federal courts, the ATF conclusion was incorrect.

''When an employer discriminates against someone because the person is transgender, the employer has engaged in disparate treatment related to the sex of the victim,'' the decision states. ''This is true regardless of whether an employer discriminates against an employee because the individual has expressed his or her gender in a non-stereotypical fashion, because the employer is uncomfortable with the fact that the person has transitioned or is in the process of transitioning from one gender to another, or because the employer simply does not like that the person is identifying as a transgender person.''

The case has now been sent back to the ATF for consideration in light of the EEOC decision, but either the agency or Macy now have 30 days to ask the commission to reconsider its decision.

THE IMPLICATIONS: Minter, who has been working for LGBT legal equality since law school in the early 1990s, says, ''This is huge. This is a real sea change.

''To have just a clear, definitive EEOC ruling that Title VII protects transgender people gives us so much more certainty and security and solid, reliable legal protection. For decades now, advocates and scholars both have been saying Title VII should be applied to protect transgender people,'' he says. ''And now, to have the EEOC confirm that, 'Yes ... Title VII should and does protect transgender people when they're discriminated against because they've changed their sex or intend to change their sex or because they're gender nonconforming. That is sex discrimination.' That is really an important capstone.''

Davis, the head of the Transgender Law Center, says the decision is a ''big leap forward in the journey to equality.'' Explaining, he says, ''It is the game-changer, asserting that transgender people can bring claims at EEOC offices across the country.''

Throughout the 53 district offices of the EEOC, investigators will now accept claims brought by transgender people, and — though the EEOC process means it could take some time — the EEOC's legal staff can bring lawsuits against employers the agency has determined have discriminated against transgender employees or job applicants.

Another impact, Davis says, is on Macy, and the fact that today's decision, while significant, doesn't mean her case is over. The decision only sends Macy's case back to the ATF Office of Equal Opportunity for resolution. ''We need to make sure that Mia is able to have her case dealt with fairly, and we're confident in a positive decision from the ATF,'' Davis says.

Minter notes that the decision will, in his view, quickly have application outside of the case, the EEOC and the courts, noting: ''It sends a really strong message to all employers and I think will have a dramatic impact on business culture. This has such a strong legitimating impact in many different arenas.''

One of those potentially impacted arenas is the political one, where President Obama has faced criticism for nearly the past two weeks since his decision, announced April 11, not to pursue an executive order banning federal contractors from discriminating in employment on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. Although White House press secretary Jay Carney has repeatedly pointed to the Employment Non-Discrimination Act as the path forward for workplace protections, that bill is stalled in a Republican-led House that opposes it and a Democratic-led Senate that hasn't even held a hearing on the measure during this Congress.

Both Davis and Minter say that the EEOC's decision doesn't reduce the need for ENDA — particularly as the decision has no impact on sexual-orientation discrimination — but Minter acknowledges, at least as to gender identity, that this decision could shift the ground somewhat.

''It would still be important to have specific federal protection, but having protection by an EEOC ruling — which is consistent with the trend of federal courts — that is very significant, that's very strong protection,'' he says. ''Title VII is a very protective statute, and transgender people being able to rely on that statute now is transformative.''

The EEOC's decision, though given significant deference by federal courts, could be overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court, which — though unlikely following Price Waterhouse and Oncale — is a possibility that will lead advocates like Minter to continue to push for gender-identity-specific protection, as well as sexual-orientation protection, in legislation like ENDA.

Today's decision also could make the signing of the executive order and the passage of ENDA easier if the gender-identity provision in those items would be seen as buttressing existing Title VII protections because of the fact that, as ENDA lead sponsor Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) said at the end of the 111th Congress in 2010, the gender identity provision had been the provision about which more education was needed before enough members would be willing to support it.

For today, though, transgender advocates are focused on the EEOC decision, itself a breakthrough.
Turner, TLC's legal director, says, ''Discrimination against transgender people in the workplace remains at unacceptably high levels, but we're hopeful that with a positive ruling from the EEOC, transgender people across the country will now know that they are in fact protected by federal law if they're denied a job or fired just because of who they are. And that's a really big deal.''

Macy, hopeful even a year into this fight to do the job that she'd been trained to do, breaks it down even further.

''It's one more piece in the puzzle of equality. It's kinda hokey, but it is,'' she says. ''It's one more locking little piece in that puzzle.''
Understanding the EEOC ProcessA Woman's Fight, A Couple's ResilienceTransgender BreakthroughTransgender Breakthrough


Short North Gala Honors Local Leaders Including Jeff Smith












Short North Gala Honors Local Leaders

Short North Gala, Sunday April 29th
Join other residents, businesses and local organizations as the Short North Arts districts hosts their 6th Annual Short North Gala this Sunday.

Unsung Heroes Jeff Smith (SNCA President), Rob Harris (Harrison West Society President), and Chip Smith (Short North Stop Director) will be recognized along with Luminary Award winner Jack Lucks (Columbus developer) and the City of Columbus Public Service Department as outstanding District Partners.  The SID Star Awards will also thank the Wood Companies, Kroger Co., and Kevin Lykens for their invaluable contributions.


Jeff Smith (Photo from Facebook)

Exceptional food and drink provided by top Short North area establishments offering a fine sampling of the best the neighborhood has to offer.

Sunday, April 29th, 6-10pm at the Greek Orthodox Cathedral (555 N. High Street).

Tickets available online ShortNorthGala.com or by phone at 614-299-8050.
 

Community Forum Looks Ahead

Last Thursday, the Short North Civic Association lead an open meeting to share in much of the planned development for the area.

John Angelo, head of the Short North SID along with SNBA Director Diesha Condon gave great insight into how the community is working with developers and the city to minimize obstruction, parking shortages and other distrubances amidst a number of new planned construction projects coming our way.

Westiminster Thurber shared layouts for their planned third building, while COTA updated the group on their green initiatives, local route changes as well as recent facility and bus upgrades.

Become a member of the Short North Civic Association

The SNCA welcomes all area homeowners, renters, business owners, and employees to become members. Annual SNCA memberships cost $25 for individuals, $50 per household, and $75 for businesses. They can be purchased by visiting the link below.