Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Statement by President Obama on DOD Report on Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell




THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

______________________________________________________________________________

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

November 30, 2010

Statement by President Obama on DOD Report on Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell

As Commander in Chief, I have pledged to repeal the “don’t ask, don’t tell” law because it weakens our national security, diminishes our military readiness, and violates fundamental American principles of fairness and equality by preventing patriotic Americans who are gay from serving openly in our armed forces. At the same time, as Commander in Chief, I am committed to ensuring that we understand the implications of this transition, and maintain good order and discipline within our military ranks. That is why I directed the Department of Defense earlier this year to begin preparing for a transition to a new policy.

Today’s report confirms that a strong majority of our military men and women and their families—more than two thirds—are prepared to serve alongside Americans who are openly gay and lesbian. This report also confirms that, by every measure—from unit cohesion to recruitment and retention to family readiness—we can transition to a new policy in a responsible manner that ensures our military strength and national security. And for the first time since this law was enacted 17 years ago today, both the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff have publicly endorsed ending this policy.

With our nation at war and so many Americans serving on the front lines, our troops and their families deserve the certainty that can only come when an act of Congress ends this discriminatory policy once and for all. The House of Representatives has already passed the necessary legislation. Today I call on the Senate to act as soon as possible so I can sign this repeal into law this year and ensure that Americans who are willing to risk their lives for their country are treated fairly and equally. Our troops represent the virtues of selfless sacrifice and love of country that have enabled our freedoms. I am absolutely confident that they will adapt to this change and remain the best led, best trained, best equipped fighting force the world has ever known.

###


Wednesday is CATF's "Reason to Dine"...Get Out and Eat!

Much more information to here


A Reason To Dine; Wednesday, December 1st - World AIDS Day

What's the importance of dining for a reason?

With HIV/AIDS funding being cut across the nation, and here in Ohio, it is more important than ever to bring awareness of the disease and its affects on our community to the forefront. "A Reason To Dine" hopes to help raise that awareness. All it takes from you, is going out to eat or hosting a dinner party. Any awareness you create makes a HUGE impact in fight the stigma and silence

We have restaurants that are donating up to 50%! Are your favorites here? We suggest reservations on the night of the event, as they are likely to be very busy.

The list is also here
  • Level Dining Lounge

    Level Dining Lounge was the first restaurant on board in 2009 and they were the first on board this year! They have an amazing Cajun Chicken! They are donating 15% of sales to the cause!

  • Lemongrass Fusion Bistro

    Last year, Lemongrass Fusion Bistro donated the most money during this event. This year, they have DOUBLED the amount. They are donating 50%... yes, 50% of the sales for "A Reason To Dine" to fight HIV and stigma here in Central Ohio. If you are planning on going there, we HIGHLY suggest you make reservations...EARLY. You can do that from their website.

  • Union Cafe

    Union Cafe has always been a supporter of the Columbus AIDS Task Force. When we approached them last year, they were very eager to join in this event. This year, once again, they jumped on board. They are donating 25% of sales this year! Its the second highest so far!

  • MaMa Mimi's Take and Bake Pizza

    Mama Mimi's Take and Bake Pizza is new to our fundraiser this year. After hearing about the event last year, they wanted to be a part of it this year. ALL 6 stores in Central Ohio will be participating in the event.

  • Bakery Gingham

    Bakery Gingham participated with us last year. They only had the Short North location last year, but this year, both the Short North and the German Village locations are participating. They will also be making the red velvet cream cheese topped "red ribbon" cupcake specially for the event. They are donating 15% of sales! Order for your office or group early, or go by and pick them up the day of!

  • Barrio

    Barrio is new to "A Reason To Dine." Barrio is grounded in contemporary American culture, however its essence is inspired by the smells, flavors, images, and festive atmosphere Latin American and Spanish-speaking communities enjoy. Barrio is a true Tapas bar and lounge that features authentic dishes from all over South America and Spain, as well as wines from Argentina and Chile. They are donating 10% of sales to the cause! You can make reservations on their website.

  • Due Amici

    Last year, Due Amici participated in "A Reason To Dine" and when presented this year, they were one of the first to sign up! It's suggested to make reservations, which you can do on their website. They are donating 10% of sales to the cause.

  • Betty's

    Betty's has always been a supporter of the Columbus AIDS Task Force. When we approached them last year, they were very eager to join in this event. This year, once again, they jumped on board. They are donating 15% of sales, and they are donating $1.50 from every "Berry Betty" drink sold!

  • TipTop Kitchen and Cocktails

    TipTop Kitchen and Cocktails was slammed last year during this event! They were happy to be a part of our awareness fundraiser again this year. They are donating 15% of their sales and $1.00 from every "Alice Wing" sold that day!

  • Donatos Pizza

    Donatos Pizza (Short North Location ONLY) was on board last year. Donatos has always been a supporter of CATF and HIV/AIDS awareness. If you don't feel like eating out, order a pizza! You can still participate! They are donating 20% of the days sales to the cause!

  • Surley Girl Saloon

    Last year, Surly Girl participated in "A Reason To Dine" and when presented this year, they were immediately on board and we are very happy to have them! They are donating 15% of sales and $1 from every "Smoking Gun" drink to the cause. Just an FYI... they have a macaroni and cheese dish that is to die for!

  • Dirty Franks Hot Dog Place

    Dirty Franks is new this year to our fundraiser! One recent reviewer wrote " Since I started working a few blocks away in January, this has become my go-to lunch spot when I'm too lazy to pack, and my favorite place to take people when they're visiting Columbus." They are donating 10% of sales to the cause!

  • Jersey Mike's Subs in Powell and Dublin

    Jersey Mikes (Powell and Dublin locations) are both on board to be a part of this event! They have been a strong supporter of CATF and we encourage you to go have a sub there for lunch or dinner if you are in that area! They are donating 10% of their sales!

  • The Buckeye Connection

    The Buckeye Connection joined "A Reason To Dine" this year, and event though they are not a restaurant, they are still participating! If you are going to buy Buckeye gifts for Christmas, buy them on December 1st! They are donating 25% of their sales!

  • Hoggy's Barbecue - Grandview

    Hoggy's joined "A Reason To Dine" this year! They are very excited to be a part of it! If you want some great Barbecue, go here! They are donating 15% of their sales

HRC: Pentagon Working Group Report Confirms No Major Impediments to Open Service

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: November 30, 2010
Paul Guequierre | paul.guequierre@hrc.org |

The DADT Report and other data is here


Pentagon Working Group Report Confirms No Major Impediments to Open Service

“Most comprehensive review… ever undertaken” shows end to military’s gay ban comes with few hurdles to implementation

WASHINGTON – The Pentagon’s Comprehensive Working Group studying how to implement repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” has found few hurdles to implementation of open service by gays and lesbians, according to their report released today. The news provides tremendous momentum for upcoming Senate action on repeal, said the Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) civil rights organization.

“This issue has been studied for fifty years, including by the military itself, and the results from over twenty-two studies are uniform: open service does not harm effectiveness,” said HRC President Joe Solmonese. “The small handful of Senators blocking repeal no longer have any fig leaves behind which to hide. The time for repeal is now.”

A survey of troops – while not a referendum on repeal but rather a tool to gauge attitudes about repeal – showed that seventy percent of service members thought having an openly gay or lesbian colleague in their unit would have either a positive, mixed or no effect. For those who believe they have already worked with a gay or lesbian service member, ninety-two percent say their unit’s ability to work together was very good, good or neither good nor poor.

“America’s men and women in uniform are professionals who already serve with gays and lesbians and repeal will do nothing to change their dedication to protecting our nation,” said Solmonese. “Senators who said they want to hear from military leaders and troops now have their answers. Repeal of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ will allow every qualified man and woman to serve without sacrificing the high standards that have made our military great.”

Twenty-five nations allow open service by gays and lesbians and all of them have implemented repeal of their bans without major disruptions – including close allies such as the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and Israel. Further, a failure of Congress to act now will tie the hands of military leaders who have asked for the power to implement the changes that today’s report lays out.

The Human Rights Campaign is America’s largest civil rights organization working to achieve lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equality. By inspiring and engaging all Americans, HRC strives to end discrimination against LGBT citizens and realize a nation that achieves fundamental fairness and equality for all.




Sunday, November 28, 2010

Columbus Dispatch: Smarter Searching, Mobile devices put listing information in the palms of homebuyers' hands




The story is here


Sunday, November 28, 2010 03:01 AM

THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH

When Bob Barnes and Ryan Poirier headed out a few weeks ago to shop for homes, they made sure to bring Barnes' cell phone - but not to call people.

They wanted the phone to find homes.

With the help of their real-estate agent, Barnes and Poirier had placed a home-search tool called Smarter Agent on Barnes' Android phone. The service guided them to homes for sale in the Clintonville neighborhood they were searching.



Ryan Poirier, left, and Bob Barnes use an Android phone to search for homes in Clintonville, including this one on Acton Road.

"You don't have to lug around a computer or have tons of printouts," Barnes said. "When we drove into an area, the phone lists the closest homes for sale, and then you can see the homes and look at pictures."

Such mobile technology is changing the way many buyers search for real estate.

"It's the next generation of shopping for a home," said Barnes' agent, Terry Penrod, with Real Living HER. "What the Internet did for real estate, the mobile application will do for the search. It puts data into the buyers' hands where they want it when they want it."

Get my free application here

Mobile devices have long had uses in real-estate searches, from simply texting an agent to sending a photo of a house.

But smart phones such as iPhones, Palms, BlackBerries and Androids dramatically changed the game by combining easy Web access with the GPS, allowing shoppers to browse a neighborhood and pull up information on homes for sale as they pass by.

No one tracks how many people use such services on smart phones or other mobile devices such as iPads, but agents and experts say use has leapt the past few years.

On an iPad, homebuyers can circle a neighborhood to search.

"There's definitely been growth," said Sarah Poston, e-marketing director for Coldwell Banker King Thompson. "Over 90 percent of homebuyers in general are using the Internet to search for homes, and 30 percent of the nation is accessing the Internet through mobile devices."

Some services focus on a portion of real-estate listings such as foreclosed properties or rentals.

But the most common combine real-estate listing information with mapping services. Among the most popular such applications are those produced by Realtor. com, Zillow, Coldwell Banker, Trulia and Homes.com.

All allow users to find homes for sale near their current location or near an address they enter. Most draw listings directly from local Multiple Listing Services, although a Dispatch sample found a wide variance in the number of listings the five applications pulled up.

The information can be refined by price range, type of property, number of bedrooms and so forth. Users can click on the homes to access the same details they would find online with, typically, several photos of the home.

Beyond that basic function, the services vary slightly in the way the information is presented:

• Realtor.com's service allows users to search neighborhood open houses, and in the Dispatch sample, appeared to offer the fullest lineup of listings.

• Coldwell Banker also allows a search of recent sales, open houses and listings that have appeared in the past seven days, although in a test, Coldwell Banker's listings were not as comprehensive as some others.

• Zillow presents both map and listing details on the same screen, allowing a user to see information about homes without losing the map. Zillow also adds an estimate of a home's worth (what it calls its "Zestimate") and, on the same screen, shows homes recently sold in addition to homes for sale.

• Trulia also offers open-house searches and searches for properties that are for sale, for rent or have been sold, though not on the same page. The listings were not as comprehensive as others, though the service offers one unusual feature: searching strictly homes that have dropped in price.

• Homes.com also failed to show many listings, although the service offers one potentially useful function: a mortgage calculator on each listing, allowing an immediate check of the monthly payment.

Such services are available on smart phones, but companies are now exploring ways to provide similar services to conventional cell phones. Coldwell Banker offers something called prtmobile, which allows users of any phone to call a number, punch in the code from a real-estate sign and learn about a house and request a showing from the agent.

Patrick Guanciale, a Coldwell Banker agent in Newark, has been using the service for some of his listings for more than a year.

A real-estate agent's sign in Newark includes signage for PRT, which allows potential buyers to search for homes using a mobile device.

"I was at the Quarter Horse Congress a few weeks ago and got a call about one of my listings," Guanciale said. "I was able to stand there and tell them about it, and send them more information. I sent them 22 pictures."

Real Living HER is exploring a similar service that uses a street address instead of a code from the sign.

Some companies are also exploring something called QR code, which skips the dialing part altogether. Shoppers with the phones that can read the codes can simply scan the code into a phone to access the information.

Such applications are useful, but they are basically extensions of what people can do from their personal computer, notes Mark Lesswing, the senior vice president and chief technology officer with the National Association of Realtors.

In the future, he said, look for services that are unique to mobile devices, such as phones that recognize images, allowing users to simply point the phone at the house and automatically download information.

A variation of this service that's potentially on the horizon would allow a home shopper to scan a neighborhood he likes with his phone, and the service would suggest similar neighborhoods he might consider.

"A lot of what we've seen so far is somewhat pedestrian," Lesswing said. "You'll see that change."

jweiker@dispatch.com

Please note: One image was added to this post

Friday, November 26, 2010

NY Times: Gay ‘Progressive’ Republican on Air in Iowa

The story is here

November 24, 2010, 6:10 pm

Gay ‘Progressive’ Republican on Air in Iowa

It’s never too early to test the waters – especially for an openly gay “progressive” Republican trying to snag the party’s 2012 presidential nomination.

Fred Karger, a long-time political operative who was a campaign aide to Ronald Reagan, has already started broadcasting campaign advertisements in Iowa and New Hampshire.

In a 90-second spot that will run twice daily on Fox News throughout Iowa for a week, Mr. Karger calls himself an “independent Republican” and says he is “testing the waters in Iowa to see if I can raise some funds from my friends.”



Mr. Karger, 60, has never held elected office and acknowledges that he does not have much of a shot at winning his party’s nod. Instead, his goal is to make history as the first openly gay presidential candidate for a major party.

“My overriding goal is to be a participant in those Republican debates,” he said in an interview on Wednesday. “I need to start early.”

But Mr. Karger is hardly a political neophyte. He worked alongside the famed Republican strategist, Lee Atwater, to derail Michael Dukakis’s 1988 presidential campaign against George H.W. Bush. He was an outspoken critic of the Mormon Church for backing the 2008 ballot measure outlawing same-sex marriage in California. The liberal magazine Mother Jones described Mr. Karger as one of the G.O.P’s “top dark-arts operators” in a profile last spring.

Mr. Karger has already run a one-minute television ad in New Hampshire for a week in September. The two ad buys cost him about $1,000 each – pocket change by most campaign’s standards; in return, Mr. Karger gets some face time in the two states that play key roles early in the primary season.

Mr. Karger has been busy for a long-shot single-issue candidate. He announced his interest in running for president in April and established an exploratory committee three months later. Since then he has made 14 trips to New Hampshire or Iowa and now employs two full-time campaign aides.

Between divisions within the Republican Party and President Obama’s failure to deliver on promises to the gay community, Mr. Karger said “the time is right.”

This year's central Ohio housing market mirroring 2009



Posted: 11/22/2010
Columbus Board of REALTORS®

(November 23, 2010) The housing market in central Ohio, which rebounded nicely when the federal tax credits were offered in 2009 and early 2010, today is looking like “more of the same.”

According to the Columbus Board of REALTORS® (CBR), the number of homes sold and the average price of homes sold from January though October 2010 are nearly identical to the statistics from 2009.

The number of homes sold from January through October was 16,891 – almost identical to the 16,932 homes sold in the same period of 2009. Average sale price so far this year is $160,671 compared to $161,623 last year.

“While we certainly would like to see a more lively housing market, we’re just pleased that year-to-date numbers are holding their own,” says CBR President Sue Lusk-Gleich.

Home sales are likely to grow in 2011, but not too quickly. According to the New York Federal Reserve Bank, household finances are improving, and major purchases will increase as well.

Freddie Mac reports that the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate in October 2010 was 4.23 percent – the lowest rate since the statistics were first recorded by Freddie Mac in 1971. Ten years ago, the rate was 7.8 percent; 20 years ago, it was 10.17 percent; 30 years ago, it was 13.79 percent. According to Lusk-Gleich, “The time to buy is now.”

“Those of us in the real estate profession continue to talk about how perfect this market is for many buyers – especially for those purchasing their first home,” Lusk-Gleich adds.

The Columbus Board of REALTORS® Multiple Listing Service (MLS) serves all of Franklin, Delaware, Fayette, Madison, Morrow, Pickaway and Union Counties and parts of Champagne, Clark, Hocking, Licking, Fairfield, Knox, Logan, Marion, and Ross Counties.

For more information about the central Ohio housing market, visit www.ColumbusRealtors.com

To view residential properties for sale, visit www.terrypenrod.com


Thursday, November 25, 2010

Southern Poverty Law Center: 10 Anti-Gay Myths Debunked



The story is here

10 Anti-Gay Myths Debunked

By Evelyn Schlatter and Robert Steinback

Ever since born-again singer and orange juice pitchwoman Anita Bryant helped kick off the contemporary anti-gay movement more than 30 years ago, hard-line elements of the religious right have been searching for ways to demonize homosexuals — or, at a minimum, to find arguments that will prevent their normalization in society. For the former Florida beauty queen and her Save Our Children group, it was the alleged plans of gays and lesbians to “recruit” in schools that provided the fodder for their crusade. But in addition to hawking that myth, the legions of anti-gay activists who followed have added a panoply of others, ranging from the extremely doubtful claim that homosexuality is a choice, to unalloyed lies like the claims that gays molest children far more than heterosexuals or that hate crime laws will lead to the legalization of bestiality and necrophilia. These fairy tales are important to the anti-gay right because they form the basis of its claim that homosexuality is a social evil that must be suppressed — an opinion rejected by virtually all relevant medical and scientific authorities. They also almost certainly contribute to hate crime violence directed at homosexuals, who are more targeted for such attacks than any other minority in America. What follows are 10 key myths propagated by the anti-gay movement, along with the truth behind the propaganda.

MYTH # 1
Homosexuals molest children at far higher rates than heterosexuals.


THE ARGUMENT
Depicting gay men as a threat to children may be the single most potent weapon for stoking public fears about homosexuality — and for winning elections and referenda, as Anita Bryant found out during her successful 1977 campaign to overturn a Dade County, Fla., ordinance barring discrimination against gay people. Discredited psychologist Paul Cameron, the most ubiquitous purveyor of anti-gay junk science, has been a major promoter of this myth. Despite having been debunked repeatedly and very publicly, Cameron’s work is still widely relied upon by anti-gay organizations, although many no longer quote him by name.

THE FACTS
According to the American Psychological Association, “homosexual men are not more likely to sexually abuse children than heterosexual men are.” Gregory Herek, a professor at the University of California, Davis, who is one of the nation’s leading researchers on prejudice against sexual minorities, reviewed a series of studies and found no evidence that gay men molest children at higher rates than heterosexual men.

Anti-gay activists who make that claim allege that all men who molest male children should be seen as homosexual. But research by A. Nicholas Groth, a pioneer in the field of sexual abuse of children, shows that is not so. Groth found that there are two types of child molesters: fixated and regressive. The fixated child molester — the stereotypical pedophile — cannot be considered homosexual or heterosexual because “he often finds adults of either sex repulsive” and often molests children of both sexes. Regressive child molesters are generally attracted to other adults, but may “regress” to focusing on children when confronted with stressful situations. Groth found that the majority of regressed offenders were heterosexual in their adult relationships.

The Child Molestation Research and Prevention Institute notes that 90% of child molesters target children in their network of family and friends. Most child molesters, therefore, are not gay people lingering outside schools waiting to snatch children from the playground, as much religious-right rhetoric suggests.

MYTH # 2
Same-sex parents harm children.


THE ARGUMENT
Most hard-line anti-gay organizations are heavily invested, from both a religious and a political standpoint, in promoting the traditional nuclear family as the sole framework for the healthy upbringing of children. They maintain a reflexive belief that same-sex parenting must be harmful to children — although the exact nature of that supposed harm varies widely.

THE FACTS
No legitimate research has demonstrated that same-sex couples are any more or any less harmful to children than heterosexual couples.

The American Academy of Pediatrics in a 2002 policy statement declared: “A growing body of scientific literature demonstrates that children who grow up with one or two gay and/or lesbian parents fare as well in emotional, cognitive, social, and sexual functioning as do children whose parents are heterosexual.” That policy statement was reaffirmed in 2009.

The American Psychological Association found that “same-sex couples are remarkably similar to heterosexual couples, and that parenting effectiveness and the adjustment, development and psychological well-being of children is unrelated to parental sexual orientation.”

Similarly, the Child Welfare League of America’s official position with regard to same-sex parents is that “lesbian, gay, and bisexual parents are as well-suited to raise children as their heterosexual counterparts.”

MYTH # 3
People become homosexual because they were sexually abused as children or there was a deficiency in sex-role modeling by their parents.


THE ARGUMENT
Many anti-gay rights proponents claim that homosexuality is a mental disorder caused by some psychological trauma or aberration in childhood. This argument is used to counter the common observation that no one, gay or straight, consciously chooses his or her sexual orientation. Joseph Nicolosi, a founder of the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality, said in 2009 that “if you traumatize a child in a particular way, you will create a homosexual condition.” He also has repeatedly said, “Fathers, if you don’t hug your sons, some other man will.” A side effect of this argument is the demonization of parents of homosexuals, who are led to wonder if they failed to protect a child against sexual abuse or failed as role models in some important way. In October 2010, Kansas State University family studies professor Walter Schumm said he was about to release a related study arguing that homosexual couples are more likely than heterosexuals to raise gay or lesbian children.

THE FACTS
No scientifically sound study has linked sexual orientation or identity with parental role-modeling or childhood sexual abuse.

The American Psychiatric Association noted in a 2000 fact sheet on gay, lesbian and bisexual issues that “no specific psychosocial or family dynamic cause for homosexuality has been identified, including histories of childhood sexual abuse.” The fact sheet goes on to say that sexual abuse does not appear to be any more prevalent among children who grow up and identify as gay, lesbian or bisexual than in children who grow up and identify as heterosexual.

Similarly, the National Organization on Male Sexual Victimization notes on its website that “experts in the human sexuality field do not believe that premature sexual experiences play a significant role in late adolescent or adult sexual orientation” and added that it’s unlikely that someone can make another person a homosexual or heterosexual.

With regard to Schumm’s study, critics have already said that he appears to have merely aggregated anecdotal data, a biased sample that invalidates his findings.

MYTH # 4
Homosexuals don’t live nearly as long as heterosexuals.


THE ARGUMENT
Anti-gay organizations want to promote heterosexuality as the healthier “choice.” Furthermore, the purportedly shorter life spans and poorer physical and mental health of homosexuals are often offered as reasons why gays and lesbians shouldn’t be allowed to adopt or foster children.

THE FACTS
This falsehood can be traced directly to the discredited research of Paul Cameron and his Family Research Institute, specifically a 1994 paper he co-wrote entitled, “The Lifespan of Homosexuals.” Using obituaries collected from gay newspapers, he and his two co-authors concluded that gay men died, on average, at 43, compared to an average life expectancy at the time of around 73 for all U.S. men. On the basis of the same obituaries, Cameron also claimed that gay men are 18 times more likely to die in car accidents than heterosexuals, 22 times more likely to die of heart attacks than whites, and 11 times more likely than blacks to die of the same cause. He also concluded that lesbians are 487 times more likely to die of murder, suicide, or accidents than straight women.

Remarkably, these claims have become staples of the anti-gay right and have frequently made their way into far more mainstream venues. For example, William Bennett, education secretary under President Reagan, used Cameron’s statistics in a 1997 interview he gave to ABC News’ “This Week.”

However, like virtually all of his “research,” Cameron’s methodology is egregiously flawed — most obviously because the sample he selected (the data from the obits) was not remotely statistically representative of the homosexual population as a whole. Even Nicholas Eberstadt, a demographer at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, has called Cameron’s methods “just ridiculous.”

MYTH # 5
Homosexuals controlled the Nazi Party and helped to orchestrate the Holocaust.


THE ARGUMENT
This claim comes directly from a 1995 book titled The Pink Swastika: Homosexuality in the Nazi Party, by Scott Lively and Kevin Abrams. Lively is the virulently anti-gay founder of Abiding Truth Ministries and Abrams is an organizer of a group called the International Committee for Holocaust Truth, which came together in 1994 and included Lively as a member.

The primary argument Lively and Abrams make is that gay people were not victimized by the Holocaust. Rather, Hitler deliberately sought gay men for his inner circle because their “unusual brutality” would help him run the party and mastermind the Holocaust. In fact, “the Nazi party was entirely controlled by militaristic male homosexuals throughout its short history,” the book claims. “While we cannot say that homosexuals caused the Holocaust, we must not ignore their central role in Nazism,” Lively and Abrams add. “To the myth of the ‘pink triangle’ — the notion that all homosexuals in Nazi Germany were persecuted — we must respond with the reality of the ‘pink swastika.’”

These claims have been picked up by a number of anti-gay groups and individuals, including Bryan Fischer of the American Family Association, as proof that homosexuals are violent and sick. The book has also attracted an audience among anti-gay church leaders in Eastern Europe and among Russian-speaking anti-gay activists in America.

THE FACTS
The Pink Swastika has been roundly discredited by legitimate historians and other scholars. Christine Mueller, professor of history at Reed College, did a line-by-line refutation of an earlier (1994) Abrams article on the topic and of the broader claim that the Nazi Party was “entirely controlled” by gay men. Historian Jon David Wynecken at Grove City College also refuted the book, pointing out that Lively and Abrams did no primary research of their own, instead using out-of-context citations of some legitimate sources while ignoring information from those same sources that ran counter to their thesis.

The myth that the Nazis condoned homosexuality sprang up in the 1930s, started by socialist opponents of the Nazis as a slander against Nazi leaders. Credible historians believe that only one of the half-dozen leaders in Hitler’s inner circle, Ernst Röhm, was gay. (Röhm was murdered on Hitler’s orders in 1934.) The Nazis considered homosexuality one aspect of the “degeneracy” they were trying to eradicate.

When the National Socialist Party came to power in 1933, it quickly strengthened Germany’s existing penalties against homosexuality. Heinrich Himmler, Hitler’s security chief, announced that homosexuality was to be “eliminated” in Germany, along with miscegenation among the races. Historians estimate that between 50,000 and 100,000 men were arrested for homosexuality (or suspicion of it) under the Nazi regime. These men were routinely sent to concentration camps and many thousands died there.

In 1942, the Nazis instituted the death penalty for homosexuals. Offenders in the German military were routinely shot. Himmler put it like this: “We must exterminate these people root and branch. … We can’t permit such danger to the country; the homosexual must be completely eliminated.”

MYTH # 6
Hate crime laws will lead to the jailing of pastors who criticize homosexuality and the legalization of practices like bestiality and necrophilia.


THE ARGUMENT
Anti-gay activists, who have long opposed adding LGBT people to those protected by hate crime legislation, have repeatedly claimed that such laws would lead to the jailing of religious figures who preach against homosexuality — part of a bid to gain the backing of the broader religious community for their position. Janet Porter of Faith2Action was one of many who asserted that the federal Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act — signed into law by President Obama in October 2009 — would “jail pastors” because it “criminalizes speech against the homosexual agenda.”

In a related assertion, anti-gay activists claimed the law would lead to the legalization of psychosexual disorders (paraphilias) like bestiality and pedophilia. Bob Unruh, a conservative Christian journalist who left The Associated Press in 2006 for the right-wing, conspiracist news site WorldNetDaily, said shortly before the federal law was passed that it would legalize “all 547 forms of sexual deviancy or ‘paraphilias’ listed by the American Psychiatric Association.” This claim was repeated by many anti-gay organizations, including the Illinois Family Institute.

THE FACTS
The claim that hate crime laws could result in the imprisonment of those who “oppose the homosexual lifestyle” is false. The Constitution provides robust protections of free speech, and case law makes it clear that even a preacher who suggested that homosexuals should be killed would be protected.

Neither do hate crime laws — which provide for enhanced penalties when persons are victimized because of their “sexual orientation” (among other factors) — “protect pedophiles,” as Janet Porter and many others have claimed. According to the American Psychological Association, sexual orientation refers to heterosexuality, homosexuality and bisexuality — not paraphilias such as pedophilia. Paraphilias, as defined by the American Psychiatric Assocation, are disorders characterized by sexual urges or behaviors directed at nonhuman objects or non-consenting persons like children, or that involve the suffering or humiliation of one’s partner.

Even if pedophiles, for example, were protected under a hate crime law — and such a law has not been suggested or contemplated anywhere — that would not legalize or “protect” pedophilia. Pedophilia is illegal sexual activity, and a law that more severely punished people who attacked pedophiles would not change that.

MYTH # 7
Allowing homosexuals to serve openly would damage the armed forces.


THE ARGUMENT
Anti-gay groups are adamantly opposed to allowing gay men and lesbians to serve openly in the armed forces, not only because of their purported fear that combat readiness will be undermined, but because the military has long been considered the purest meritocracy in America (the armed forces were successfully racially integrated long before American civilian society, for example). If gays can serve honorably and effectively in this meritocracy, that would suggest that there is no rational basis for discriminating against them in any way.

THE FACTS
Homosexuals now serve in the U.S. armed forces, though under the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) policy instituted in 1993, they cannot serve openly. At the same time, gays and lesbians serve openly in the armed forces of 25 countries, including Britain, Israel, South Africa, Canada and Australia, according to a report released by the Palm Center, a policy think tank at the University of California at Santa Barbara. The Palm Center report concluded that lifting bans against openly gay service personnel in these countries “ha[s] had no negative impact on morale, recruitment, retention, readiness or overall combat effectiveness.” Successful transitions to new policies were attributed to clear signals of leadership support and a focus on a uniform code of behavior without regard to sexual orientation.

A 2008 Military Times poll of active-duty military personnel, often cited by anti-gay activists, found that 10% of respondents said they would not re-enlist if the DADT policy were repealed. That would mean some 228,000 people might leave the military in that instance. But a 2009 review of that poll by the Palm Center suggested a wide disparity between what soldiers said they would do and their actual actions. It noted, for example, that far more than 10% of West Point officers in the 1970s said they would leave the service if women were admitted to the academy. “But when the integration became a reality,” the report said, “there was no mass exodus; the opinions turned out to be just opinions.” Similarly, a 1985 survey of 6,500 male Canadian service members and a 1996 survey of 13,500 British service members each revealed that nearly two-thirds expressed strong reservations about serving with gays. Yet when those countries lifted bans on gays serving openly, virtually no one left the service for that reason. “None of the dire predictions of doom came true,” the Palm Center report said.

MYTH # 8
Homosexuals are more prone to be mentally ill and to abuse drugs and alcohol.


THE ARGUMENT
Anti-gay groups want not only to depict sexual orientation as something that can be changed but also to show that heterosexuality is the most desirable “choice” — even if religious arguments are set aside. The most frequently used secular argument made by anti-gay groups in that regard is that homosexuality is inherently unhealthy, both mentally and physically. As a result, most anti-gay rights groups reject the 1973 decision by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) to remove homosexuality from its list of mental illnesses. Some of these groups, including the particularly hard-line Traditional Values Coalition, claim that “homosexual activists” managed to infiltrate the APA in order to sway its decision.

THE FACTS
All major professional mental health organizations are on record as stating that homosexuality is not a mental disorder.

It is true that LGBT people suffer higher rates of anxiety, depression, and depression-related illnesses and behaviors like alcohol and drug abuse than the general population. But studies done during the past 15 years have determined that it is the stress of being a member of a minority group in an often-hostile society — and not LGBT identity itself — that accounts for the higher levels of mental illness and drug use.

Richard J. Wolitski, an expert on minority status and public health issues at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, put it like this in 2008: “Economic disadvantage, stigma, and discrimination … increase stress and diminish the ability of individuals [in minority groups] to cope with stress, which in turn contribute to poor physical and mental health.”

MYTH # 9
No one is born a homosexual.


THE ARGUMENT
Anti-gay activists keenly oppose the granting of “special” civil rights protections to homosexuals similar to those afforded black Americans and other minorities. But if people are born gay — in the same way people have no choice as to whether they are black or white — discrimination against homosexuals would be vastly more difficult to justify. Thus, anti-gay forces insist that sexual orientation is a behavior that can be changed, not an immutable characteristic.

THE FACTS
Modern science cannot state conclusively what causes sexual orientation, but a great many studies suggest that it is the result of biological and environmental forces, not a personal “choice.” One of the more recent is a 2008 Swedish study of twins (the world’s largest twin study) that appeared in The Archives of Sexual Behavior and concluded that “[h]omosexual behaviour is largely shaped by genetics and random environmental factors.” Dr. Qazi Rahman, study co-author and a leading scientist on human sexual orientation, said: “This study puts cold water on any concerns that we are looking for a single ‘gay gene’ or a single environmental variable which could be used to ‘select out’ homosexuality — the factors which influence sexual orientation are complex. And we are not simply talking about homosexuality here — heterosexual behaviour is also influenced by a mixture of genetic and environmental factors.”

The American Psychological Association (APA) acknowledges that despite much research into the possible genetic, hormonal, social and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no evidence has emerged that would allow scientists to pinpoint the precise causes of sexual orientation. Still, the APA concludes that “most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation.”

In October 2010, Kansas State University family studies professor Walter Schumm said he was about to release a study showing that gay parents produced far more gay children than heterosexual parents. He told a reporter that he was “trying to prove [homosexuality is] not 100% genetic.” But critics suggested that his data did not prove that, and, in any event, virtually no scientists have suggested that homosexuality is caused only by genes.

MYTH # 10
Gay people can choose to leave homosexuality.


THE ARGUMENT
If people are not born gay, as anti-gay activists claim, then it should be possible for individuals to abandon homosexuality. This view is buttressed among religiously motivated anti-gay activists by the idea that homosexual practice is a sin and humans have the free will needed to reject sinful urges.

A number of “ex-gay” religious ministries have sprung up in recent years with the aim of teaching homosexuals to become heterosexuals, and these have become prime purveyors of the claim that gays and lesbians, with the aid of mental therapy and Christian teachings, can “come out of homosexuality.” Exodus International, the largest of these ministries, plainly states, “You don’t have to be gay!” Another, the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality, describes itself as “a professional, scientific organization that offers hope to those who struggle with unwanted homosexuality.”

THE FACTS
“Reparative” or sexual reorientation therapy — the pseudo-scientific foundation of the ex-gay movement — has been rejected by all the established and reputable American medical, psychological, psychiatric, and professional counseling organizations. In 2009, for instance, the American Psychological Association adopted a resolution, accompanied by a 138-page report, that repudiated ex-gay therapy. The report concluded that compelling evidence suggested that cases of individuals going from gay to straight were “rare” and that “many individuals continued to experience same-sex sexual attractions” after reparative therapy. The APA resolution added that “there is insufficient evidence to support the use of psychological interventions to change sexual orientation” and asked “mental health professionals to avoid misrepresenting the efficacy of sexual orientation change efforts by promoting or promising change in sexual orientation.” The resolution also affirmed that same-sex sexual and romantic feelings are normal.

Some of the most striking, if anecdotal, evidence of the ineffectiveness of sexual reorientation therapy has been the numerous failures of some of its most ardent advocates. For example, the founder of Exodus International, Michael Bussee, left the organization in 1979 with a fellow male ex-gay counselor because the two had fallen in love. Alan Chambers, current president of Exodus, said in 2007 that with years of therapy, he’s mostly conquered his attraction to men, but then admitted, “By no means would we ever say that change can be sudden or complete."



Wednesday, November 24, 2010

'Glee' Darren Criss and the Warblers sing Train's 'Hey Soul Sister' Exclusive Video



Special Education. Darren Criss as Blaine, as well as Chris Colfer as Kurt and the Dalton Academy Warblers singing Hey Soul Sister.
Copyright © FOX