Thursday, January 6, 2011

NY Times: A Little-Known Strategy for Cutting Mortgage Payments



Mortgages

A Little-Known Strategy for Cutting Mortgage Payments

HOMEOWNERS looking to lower their monthly mortgage payments and also save some on interest may be able to do so without all the hefty fees and daunting credit requirements of refinancing.

A little-known strategy, called “recasting,” or “re-amortization,” is available through some mortgage lenders and servicers.

It involves paying off a lump sum of the principal amount and asking to have the monthly payments reset according to the original interest rate and loan terms. The lump sum reduces the principal, so your new monthly payments decrease slightly and you save on interest paid over the life of the loan.

Lenders typically charge an administrative fee of $150 or more for this service, though borrowers are not required to pay closing costs or submit to another credit check, because they are not asking for a new loan.

Recasting works well for those unable to qualify for refinancing amid the ever-toughening credit guidelines — perhaps because they are self-employed or have less-than-stellar credit — as well as for those with extra cash, like a year-end bonus.

“People don’t really know about it,” said Alan Rosenbaum, the founder and chief executive of the Guardhill Financial Corporation in New York, “but it’s become more common recently.”

Although the term “recasting” is often used by the mortgage industry to refer to interest-rate resets on adjustable-rate mortgages, here the interest rate and loan term stay the same.

Here’s how it might work. Let’s say that as of late December, you had just over $230,449 of principal left on a 30-year fixed-rate loan for $300,000 taken out at 7.93 percent in 1995. You have been paying just under $2,187 a month in principal and interest. But if you put in $20,000 toward that remaining principal and asked your lender to reamortize your payments over the remaining 15 years on the loan, your monthly payment would drop by $52, to around $2,135. Putting in $100,000 would save $730 a month and bring payments to $1,457.

Making extra payments toward the principal while not asking the bank to recast a loan keeps monthly payments the same and merely shortens the time it takes to pay off the loan.

There are a few caveats to recasting, however. The first is that you may need to have a large sum on hand. JPMorgan Chase, for example, charges a $150 fee and requires a minimum $5,000 payment toward the principal.

Another issue is having a lender, or loan servicer, that offers the service. And even those that do may impose restrictions. JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America exclude loans backed by the Federal Housing Administration and the Department of Veterans Affairs, and loans that were sold off and securitized may also need investor approval.

While few if any lenders advertise recasting, “they are trying to become more customer-service-oriented, and they will do it on a case-by-case basis,” Mr. Rosenbaum said. Homeowners should contact their lender’s customer service department.

Lenders, which would probably rather earn thousands of dollars in closing fees from refinancing your loan, are not obliged to recast mortgages. And certain types of mortgages, for example interest-only and adjustable-rate loans, usually aren’t eligible. The borrower will also need to have been current with all mortgage payments to qualify.

Edward Ades, the owner of Universal Mortgage in Brooklyn, says recasting can be especially useful to recent buyers, for whom it makes little financial sense to refinance but who expect to receive a tax refund or other substantial money after closing on their property, like proceeds from a relative’s sale of property, stocks or other assets.

If your interest rate is 5 percent or lower, Mr. Ades added, it may not make sense to recast a loan, because the extra cash could be put into an investment with a higher return. “At the end of the day,” he said, “I always tell people they have to do whatever makes them sleep better.”

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

HRC: 2011 Flashpoints for LGBT Equality


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: January 5, 2011

CONTACT: Paul Guequierre

Media Primer:

2011 Flashpoints for LGBT Equality

Document includes new analysis of the make-up of the 112th Congress sworn in today

WASHINGTON – Today the Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender civil rights organization, released “2011 Flashpoints for LGBT Equality,” a media primer on the LGBT issues landscape for the coming year. The document includes a new analysis of the make-up of the 112th Congress being sworn in today and shows that anti-LGBT lawmakers hold a majority of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. The full document in PDF is below and available at: www.hrc.org/documents/2011Flashpoints_MediaPrimer.pdf

As the report states, this new year brings new challenges for LGBT people, but also new opportunities. Last year’s elections that resulted in the loss of the House to an anti-equality leadership, along with more anti-LGBT senators, will certainly impede – but not entirely stop – pro-LGBT federal legislative efforts. Looking at the states however, there are clear opportunities for advancing an equality agenda, including in the area of relationship recognition for same-sex couples. Of course, anti-LGBT forces will to try to turn back the clock at every opportunity, and fair-minded Americans will continue to be vigilant to preserve pro-equality laws across the country.

As the new Congress is sworn in this today, there is no denying that pro-LGBT numbers have shrunk on Capitol Hill. HRC’s new analysis shows a pick-up of 53 House seats to anti-LGBT lawmakers as well as a 5 seat addition in the Senate. Not only do those opposing basic equality hold positions of power as House leaders and committee chairmen, their ranks have swollen to 225 – a solid majority of the chamber. This presents not just a roadblock to progress but also the threat of legislation that could be damaging to the community.

House

111th 112th Variance

Anti-LGBT 172 225 +53

Pro-LGBT 196 167 -29

Mixed Record 65 43 -22

Senate

111th 112th Variance

Anti-LGBT 35 40 +5

Pro-LGBT 42 40 -2

Mixed Record 23 20 -3

The document outlines anticipated flashpoints in Congress, federal administrative changes, state legislatures and courts as well as in American culture and communities.

View the entire document in PDF at: www.hrc.org/documents/2011Flashpoints_MediaPrimer.pdf

The Human Rights Campaign is America's largest civil rights organization working to achieve lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equality. By inspiring and engaging all Americans, HRC strives to end discrimination against LGBT citizens and realize a nation that achieves fundamental fairness and equality for all.



2011Flashpoints_MediaPrimer

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Business First: Ohio Insurance Department chief Mary Jo Hudson hands in resignation


Insurance Department chief Hudson hands in resignation


Mary Jo Hudson

Ohio Department of Insurance Director Mary Jo Hudson has tendered her resignation less than a week before Republican Gov.-elect John Kasich’s administration takes over.

Hudson said Tuesday that her last day on the job will be Friday. Her resignation is effective Monday, when Kasich is sworn in. A former Columbus City Council member, Hudson was appointed to the Insurance Department when outgoing Democratic Gov. Ted Strickland took office in 2007.

Hudson said in a statement that she’s “proud of the many changes that we have implemented over the past four years that effectively protected Ohio insurance consumers while encouraging the state’s growth as a vibrant and competitive insurance market.”

Kasich has made a number of cabinet appointments in recent weeks but hasn’t yet tapped a new leader for the department.

Columbus Dispatch: In German Village, Maennerchor trustees OK sale of building to schools



GERMAN VILLAGE

Maennerchor trustees OK sale of building to schools

Tuesday, January 4, 2011 02:55 AM

ThisWeek Community Newspapers

The expansion of Stewart Alternative Elementary School has cleared a significant hurdle.

The Columbus Maennerchor's board of directors has approved the sale of its S.High Street property to the Columbus City Schools.

The district officially will take possession of the building when the $1.3million deal is closed, which tentatively is set for Jan. 12, said Kim Norris, spokeswoman for the district.

The district will then lease the main building back to the Maennerchor until Aug.31.

Several important legislative maneuvers remain.

The German Village and Brewery District commissions must approve the school district's plans, and the Columbus City Council must vote on vacating Pearl Street, which separates the two properties.

Meanwhile, the Maennerchor intends to move to an adjacent building, known as the Dutch House.

gseman@thisweeknews.com

Columbus Dispatch: You can now begin to use credit cards in parking meters


Parking? You can charge it

Tuesday, January 4, 2011 02:54 AM

The Columbus Dispatch

Columbus began installing 977 "smart" parking meters in high-traffic areas such as Downtown and the Short North yesterday.

The meters accept credit and debit cards as well as coins.

The city plans to replace its more than 4,000 coin-operated meters with the new meters, about 1,000 a year.


David Vega installs one of Columbus' first "smart" parking meters. Vega, who works for IPS Group Parking & Telecommunications in San Diego, was on Grandview Avenue yesterday.
Kyle Robertson Dispatch photos
David Vega installs one of Columbus' first "smart" parking meters. Vega, who works for IPS Group Parking & Telecommunications in San Diego, was on Grandview Avenue yesterday.
The parking meters being installed in Columbus accept credit and debit cards in addition to coins. They are powered by batteries that are solar-rechargeable, weather permitting.

Monday, January 3, 2011

White House Blog: Repealing DADT: "History Making"




The White House Blog

Repealing DADT: "History Making"

This morning, hundreds of people came together to watch as the President signed the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell into law. Throughout the week, media outlets across the country have called the repeal a significant moment in civil rights history. Here a few of the online posts and editorials we've seen.

Andrew Sullivan, The Atlantic: Obama's Long Game: 65-31

“Without the Pentagon study, it wouldn't have passed. Without Obama keeping Lieberman inside the tent, it wouldn't have passed. Without the critical relationship between Bob Gates and Obama, it wouldn't have passed. It worked our last nerve; we faced at one point a true nightmare of nothing ... for years. And then we pulled behind this president, making it his victory and the country's victory, as well as ours.”

Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Making good history

“When Obama signs a bill repealing the military’s ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ rule, it will be an event as significant for gay rights as President Harry Truman’s order integrating the U.S. military was for black Americans. Obama’s signature will mark historic progress for a nation that has for too long denigrated gay Americans. Our hope is that it is the death knell for one of the last frontiers of bigotry.”

Denver Post: For gays in the military, a measure of equality

“A basic civil right will finally be extended to thousands of men and women serving our nation in the military.”

Detroit Free Press: Another policy of prejudice rejected

“[F]or anyone whose soul is still stirred by the words of America's founding declaration, the end of DADT marks a monumental step toward the equality and justice its drafters sought to secure. And the process by which it was achieved highlights both the enduring strength of the American democratic process and the wisdom of its current stewards.”

Seattle Times: Gays in the military, an injustice repealed

“This is history making on the order of racial integration of the armed services and expanded roles for women in uniform.”

Los Angeles Times: 'Don't ask, don't tell': lessons of a long fight

“Support for repeal among the public and in Congress also reflected changing attitudes that can be credited not only to gay rights campaigners but also to ordinary gay and lesbian Americans who, by embracing their identity, made it harder for their friends, families and co-workers to cling to anti-gay prejudices.”

Las Vegas Review Journal: Closing this chapter

“President Obama is correct that sexual orientation places no limits on the ability of an American to display strength, courage and character. Despite the prohibition, gays have served and fought honorably in many armies -- and have essentially been integrated in the military for decades. Irrational prejudice is a thing to be confronted and overcome.”

Louisville Courier-Journal: Repealing bigotry

“’It is time to close this chapter in our history,’ Mr. Obama said last Saturday. ‘It is time to recognize that sacrifice, valor and integrity are no more defined by sexual orientation than they are by race or gender, religion or creed. It is time to allow gay and lesbian Americans to serve their country openly.’ A lot had to happen for an American commander in chief to be able to make that remarkable statement. Public attitudes had to change, and they have. Brave men and women had to risk everything in trying to end this discrimination, and they did. Public officials had to stand against storms of criticism, and they stood. The military establishment had to rectify a long-standing injustice, and it bent toward justice.”

AMERICAblog Gay: Tanya Domi: 'we stand on the shoulders of many who have not lived to see this day'

"But ultimately this vote and ultimate victory, belongs to the veterans and active duty service members who would not relent to the inaccurate political belief that we should not allow gays to openly serve during the course of two ongoing wars."

Miami Herald: So long, 'don't ask, don't tell'

“At least 25 nations allow gays and lesbians to serve in the military -- including Great Britain, Canada and Israel. Surely, the time has come for the United States to adopt the same enlightened policy. With two ongoing wars, the U.S. military simply can’t afford to exclude any individual able and more than willing to serve.”

Virginian-Pilot: Good riddance to ban on gays

“The military will adapt to this change, just as it did to racial integration and to allowing women to serve. In both those cases, critics predicted the sky would fall. It didn't. It won't this time, either.”

Pittsburgh Post Gazette: Victory in battle: Reason and equality win on 'don't ask, don't tell'

“The majority of military men and women surveyed, plus the top brass, said they favored repealing the policy. Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, supported ending ‘don’t ask, don’t tell.’ What counts is that a good soldier is a good soldier.”

Houston Chronicle: A salute: Finally, all American troops can serve their country openly

“It (the repeal vote) was a rare display of principle over politics, especially in the bitterly divisive climate of this rough-and-tumble lame-duck session. Good for them, good for our troops, and good for our country. Let's hope it's catching.”

New Orleans Times-Picayune: Allowing gay men and lesbians to serve with integrity

“Gay men and lesbians are already demonstrating their valor and patriotism in the armed forces, something that members of the military clearly recognized, based on their responses in a recently released Department of Defense report. Allowing them to do so honestly is only right.”

Billie Jean King, The Huffington Post: Repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell Is a Big Deal

"I am proud to be an American and I am honored to have the men and women who serve in our armed forces put their lives on the line to protect our nation. Their race, gender or sexual orientation does not matter to me. What matters most is their commitment to our country. And that is a big deal."

Towleroad: Photo: Crowd Awaits Obama 'DADT' Signing Outside Dept. of Interior

Columbus City Councilmembers have (unanimously) elected Andrew J. Ginther President of the City Council


COLUMBUS CITY COUNCIL

MEDIA ALERT

For Immediate Release: January 3, 2011

For More Information:

John Ivanic, (614) 645-6798

COLUMBUS CITY COUNCIL ELECTS GINTHER

COUNCIL PRESIDENT

Columbus City Councilmembers have (unanimously) elected Andrew J. Ginther President of the City Council. Ginther, a councilmember since 2007, has served as the chair of Finance & Economic Development, Public Safety, and Utilities committees.

“I appreciate my colleague’s vote of confidence, and I am honored to have been chosen to lead City Council,” said Ginther. “I look forward to working with my fellow councilmembers, Mayor Coleman and community leaders to help create jobs, keep Columbus neighborhoods safe, and maintain the quality of life Columbus residents have come to expect.”

“We have a number of immediate challenges ahead of us, beginning with the appointment of two new Councilmembers and adopting a balanced budget for the coming year,” said Ginther. “I look forward to the opportunities that lie ahead, and I am ready to get to work.”

A proud graduate of Columbus City Schools, Ginther holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in political science. Before joining City Council, Ginther, spent six years on the Columbus Board of Education. A native of Columbus, he resides with his wife and daughter in Clintonville.

-30-